OSHA Workplace Violence Quiz: Check Your Prevention Know-How
True / False
True / False
True / False
True / False
Select all that apply
Put in order
Put in order
Select all that apply
Select all that apply
Select all that apply
Select all that apply
Put in order
Select all that apply
Put in order
Disclaimer
This quiz is for educational and training purposes only. It does not constitute professional certification or legal compliance verification.
Workplace Violence Prevention Missteps OSHA Looks for Under the General Duty Clause
Workplace violence prevention programs often fail in ways that make the hazard foreseeable but unmanaged—exactly what drives General Duty Clause (Section 5(a)(1)) exposure. The patterns below are common in incident reviews, employee complaints, and inspections.
1) Treating violence as “unpredictable,” not a recognized hazard
A history of threats, aggressive customers, prior assaults in the industry, late-night work, cash handling, isolated work, or home visits can establish recognition. Avoid the trap by documenting a site-specific hazard assessment tied to real tasks, locations, and shifts.
2) Training as the only control
De-escalation training helps, but OSHA expects feasible abatement beyond “tell employees to be careful.” Add engineering and administrative controls (barriers, controlled access, staffing rules, buddy systems, cash-handling limits) and show they were implemented.
3) No credible reporting pathway (or retaliation risk)
If employees don’t know what to report—or believe reporting will be punished—threat signals are missed. Use multiple channels (supervisor, anonymous, after-hours), define what to report (threats, stalking, intimidation), and document follow-up actions.
4) Inconsistent policy enforcement
“Zero tolerance” language collapses when supervisors ignore intimidation, or customer threats are excused as “part of the job.” Use objective escalation thresholds (e.g., weapon mention, credible stalking, assault, repeated threats) and apply them uniformly.
5) Weak post-incident process and recordkeeping gaps
Under-recording, skipping root-cause analysis, and failing to track corrective actions create repeat events and invite 29 CFR 1904 scrutiny. After every credible incident, complete a mini-investigation: what happened, why it was possible, what controls were added, who owns each action, and how effectiveness will be verified.
OSHA Workplace Violence Prevention Program—Printable Compliance Quick Reference
Printable note: Use your browser’s Print function to print this section or save it as a PDF for your safety binder and inspection-ready documentation.
Primary enforcement frame (OSH Act Section 5(a)(1))
- Recognized hazard: Known in your workplace, industry, or through prior incidents/near-misses.
- Likely to cause death or serious physical harm: Assaults, credible threats with capability/intent, weapon threats, severe intimidation patterns.
- Feasible means to abate: Controls that are realistic for your operations (engineering, administrative, work practices, training).
- Employer knowledge: Reports, prior incidents, security logs, staffing patterns, customer behavior, or predictable high-risk tasks.
Core program elements OSHA expects to see
- Management commitment + worker participation: Visible support, no retaliation, frontline input on controls.
- Hazard identification: Task/shift/location risk assessment; review injuries, threats, near-misses, security calls, turnover, and customer complaints.
- Prevention and controls: Apply the hierarchy of controls (engineering/admin first).
- Training: Role-specific (front desk, lone worker, supervisors); includes reporting and response procedures.
- Program evaluation: Track trends, audit controls, update after changes (layout, hours, staffing, client population).
Controls that commonly qualify as “feasible abatement”
- Engineering: Access control (locked doors/badges), barriers at points of contact, improved lighting, cameras, panic alarms, safe rooms, escape routes, furniture arrangement that preserves egress.
- Administrative: Minimum staffing rules, two-person policies for high-risk tasks, visitor management, cash-handling limits, scheduled security rounds, post-incident debrief and corrective-action tracking.
- Work practices + training: De-escalation steps, code words, when to disengage, calling law enforcement, reporting threats, and supervisor responsibilities.
Documentation to keep inspection-ready
- Written workplace violence prevention plan (or integrated safety program section).
- Hazard assessment with dates, areas reviewed, and worker input.
- Incident/threat log (including near-misses) and corrective-action tracker.
- Training rosters, lesson outlines, and competency checks for high-risk roles.
- OSHA injury and illness records (29 CFR 1904) and your recordability decision notes.
Penalty awareness (federal maximums)
OSHA civil penalty maximums are adjusted for inflation. As of January 15, 2025, maximums were $16,550 per serious violation and $165,514 per willful/repeat—so small gaps across multiple locations or hazards can compound quickly.
Workplace Violence Decision Drills Aligned to OSHA (Section 5(a)(1)) Expectations
Use these short drills to practice the same judgment calls the quiz targets: recognition, foreseeability, feasible abatement, documentation, and recordkeeping follow-through.
1) “It’s just part of the job” retail escalation
A cashier reports weekly threats from the same customer and one shove during a closing shift with solo staffing. Identify (a) what makes the hazard recognized/foreseeable, (b) two engineering controls and two administrative controls, and (c) what you will document within 48 hours.
2) Healthcare behavioral patient—control vs. restraint
An ED has repeated patient-on-staff assaults during triage overcrowding. Decide what changes you would propose in layout, staffing flow, and security response, and how you would evaluate whether the controls reduced risk (metrics and review cadence).
3) Domestic violence spillover to the workplace
An employee discloses a protective order and that their partner has shown up in the parking lot before. Define immediate steps (site access, escort, communications), privacy boundaries, and how to avoid retaliation while still controlling the hazard.
4) Lone worker field visit with credible threat
A social service worker is assigned a home visit where the client previously threatened staff. Choose a “go/no-go” decision process, the minimum staffing/buddy policy, and the check-in procedure that would qualify as feasible abatement.
5) Supervisor intimidation and inconsistent enforcement
Employees report a supervisor who threatens discipline while blocking incident reporting. List the corrective actions you would take to restore reporting integrity, including how you will ensure consistent policy enforcement across leadership.
6) Post-incident recordkeeping and corrective action
An employee is struck by a customer, receives off-site medical treatment, and misses two shifts. Determine whether it is OSHA-recordable under 29 CFR 1904 and outline the root-cause questions you will answer before closing the investigation.
Authoritative Workplace Violence Prevention References (OSHA + NIOSH)
Use these primary sources to align your workplace violence prevention program with OSHA expectations and evidence-based controls.
- OSHA: Workplace Violence (Overview) — OSHA’s central hub explaining how to evaluate and control workplace violence and how programs can be structured.
- OSHA Publications by Topic: Workplace Violence — Official guidance documents, including healthcare/social services guidelines and late-night retail recommendations.
- OSHA Directive CPL 02-01-058 (Workplace Violence Enforcement) — Enforcement procedures for occupational exposure to workplace violence, including inspection focus and documentation considerations.
- NIOSH: Workplace Violence Prevention Strategies and Research Needs (2006-144) — Research-based prevention strategies and framework concepts that support a hazard-control approach.
- OSHA Recordkeeping: Recording (29 CFR 1904) — OSHA’s official recordkeeping overview used to evaluate whether workplace violence injuries/illnesses must be recorded.
OSHA Workplace Violence Prevention FAQ (General Duty Clause + Recordkeeping)
Does OSHA have a specific workplace violence standard?
In most industries, OSHA does not have a dedicated workplace violence standard. Instead, OSHA typically relies on the OSH Act General Duty Clause (Section 5(a)(1)) when workplace violence is a recognized hazard and feasible abatement exists. OSHA also publishes extensive guidance and, in some sectors (notably healthcare and social services), uses enforcement directives to guide inspections and citations.
What evidence makes workplace violence a “recognized hazard” for Section 5(a)(1) purposes?
Recognition can come from your own history (incidents, threats, near-misses), industry experience, predictable risk factors (late-night work, cash handling, isolated work, home visits, high-stress public contact), and internal reports to supervisors or security. The key compliance move is to convert that evidence into a documented hazard assessment and a control plan with owners, dates, and verification.
What does OSHA mean by “feasible means to abate” for workplace violence?
OSHA generally expects more than policy statements and training. Feasible abatement often includes engineering controls (access control, barriers, lighting, alarms), administrative controls (staffing levels, buddy policies, visitor rules, response protocols), and work practices (disengagement rules, code words, reporting steps). If you decide a common control is not feasible, document the reason and the alternative controls you adopted.
When is a workplace violence incident OSHA-recordable under 29 CFR 1904?
Recordability depends on the outcome, not whether the event was “criminal” or “customer-caused.” If a work-related assault or violent incident leads to days away from work, restricted work, loss of consciousness, or medical treatment beyond first aid, it is typically recordable under 29 CFR 1904. Maintain clear decision notes so your log entries match medical documentation, and ensure supervisors route incidents to the recordkeeping decision-maker.
How do privacy and disability rules interact with workplace violence controls?
You can strengthen controls (access restrictions, escorts, schedule changes, reporting channels) while limiting sensitive disclosures to a need-to-know basis. Where medical conditions, trauma responses, or restrictions arise after an incident, HR processes may overlap with safety actions—especially around accommodations. For accommodation fundamentals, see the related ADA Compliance Quiz - Free Practice Questions, but keep your safety documentation focused on hazards, controls, and effectiveness.
5 OSHA-Aligned Insights for Stronger Workplace Violence Prevention
- Write your “recognized hazard” story. Tie threats and incidents to specific tasks, locations, and shifts so violence is clearly foreseeable and assessable.
- Control beats coaching. Treat de-escalation training as a support layer; prioritize access control, barriers, staffing rules, and response protocols.
- Reporting is a control. Multiple reporting channels, non-retaliation, and documented follow-up reduce risk by catching escalation early.
- Investigate for conditions, not personalities. Post-incident reviews should identify system contributors (layout, staffing, access points) and assign verified corrective actions.
- Recordkeeping discipline protects credibility. Make consistent 29 CFR 1904 decisions, retain rationale, and use trend data to drive abatement priorities.
Workplace Violence Prevention Glossary (OSHA Section 5(a)(1) Context)
- General Duty Clause (Section 5(a)(1))
- The OSH Act requirement that employers provide a workplace free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm when feasible abatement exists. Example: After repeated customer assaults, implementing controlled entry and staffing rules as feasible controls.
- Recognized hazard
- A hazard known in the workplace or industry, or supported by prior incidents, reports, or common risk factors. Example: Documented threats during late-night closing shifts establish recognition of violence risk.
- Feasible means of abatement
- Controls that are capable of being done and effective for the operation (engineering, administrative, work practice, training). Example: Installing a fixed barrier at a service counter and adopting a two-person closing policy.
- Near-miss (workplace violence)
- A threat or aggressive act that could have caused harm but did not, often due to luck or interruption. Example: A client reaches for a concealed object while making threats but is stopped before an assault occurs.
- Engineering controls
- Physical changes that reduce exposure to hazards. Example: Card-access doors that prevent unauthorized entry into staff-only areas.
- Administrative controls
- Rules and procedures that reduce risk through how work is organized. Example: A policy requiring escorts to parking areas after dark for employees working alone.
- OSHA-recordable case (29 CFR 1904)
- A work-related injury/illness meeting OSHA recording criteria (e.g., days away, restricted work, medical treatment beyond first aid). Example: An assault leading to stitches and missed shifts is generally recordable.
- Corrective-action tracking
- A documented system assigning owners and deadlines to abatement actions, with verification that actions were completed and effective. Example: “Install panic alarm at reception by May 10; verify activation test and staff training by May 17.”
